EPA Awards $1.4 Million Grant to the University of Puerto Rico to Reduce Diesel Emissions around the Port of San Juan
San Juan, P.R. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 2 is awarding a $1.4 million Diesel Emissions Reduction Act (DERA) grant to the University of Puerto Rico – Medical Sciences Campus. The grant will provide funding to replace 15 old heavy duty drayage trucks. The university will also develop seminars for diesel vehicle owners and the general public in Puerto Rico to raise awareness about the harmful environmental impacts of diesel emissions, including idling, and resources available to help reduce diesel emissions.
“It is particularly important that we are making this grant announcement to reduce diesel emissions during Asthma Awareness Month,” said EPA Regional Administrator Pete Lopez. “Puerto Rico has high asthma rates. This grant will be a great step toward improving public health and air quality in the areas surrounding the Port of San Juan.”
“We are delighted to be a grant recipient and continue our important work of reducing diesel emissions in Puerto Rico,” said Dr. Aluisio Pimenta, Professor at the Medical Sciences Campus of the University of Puerto Rico. “Our ultimate goal is to reduce asthma rates and improve overall health for Puerto Ricans.”
“Puerto Rico is one of the top U.S. jurisdictions with high prevalence of asthma. According to the Puerto Rico Department of Health, 15.5% of children suffer from this condition along with12.2% of adults on the Island. That is why we must continue to take every step and find new ways to protect the health and wellbeing of our people,” said Rep. Jenniffer Gonzalez Colon. “I thank Regional Administrator Pete Lopez and EPA for always being invaluable partners for Puerto Rico and granting the University of Puerto Rico Medical Campus this grant that will build on their work to reduce harmful diesel emissions and better the quality of life for all children and adults.”
The activities of this grant will take place in the metropolitan area of San Juan, Puerto Rico. Specifically, the grant will be targeted to areas that are particularly affected by the transportation of goods by drayage trucks going to and from the Port of San Juan. This project will replace trucks with engine model years from 1996-2006 with 2013 or newer trucks. The work for this grant will begin immediately and continue through the Spring of 2022.
It is estimated that this grant will reduce particulate matter emissions by 3.2 tons and nitrogen oxide emissions by 43.3 tons for the lifetime of the vehicles. This is the fourth DERA grant that EPA has awarded to the University of Puerto Rico – Medical Sciences Campus. In total, EPA has awarded close to $5 million for the replacement of 57 trucks and the retrofitting of 58 trucks, resulting in an estimated total particulate matter emissions reduction of 40.7 tons, and a total nitrogen oxide emissions reduction of 500.1 tons.
The Diesel Emissions Reduction Act (DERA) Program funds grants and rebates that protect human health and improve air quality by reducing harmful emissions from diesel engines. Since 2008, the DERA program has funded more than 1,000 clean diesel projects across the country, reducing emissions from more than 70,000 engines.
For more information about the Diesel Emissions Reduction Act is available at www.epa.gov/dera.
Follow EPA Region 2 on Twitter at http://twitter.com/eparegion2 and visit our Facebook page, http://facebook.com/eparegion2
20-036
# # #
“It is particularly important that we are making this grant announcement to reduce diesel emissions during Asthma Awareness Month,” said EPA Regional Administrator Pete Lopez. “Puerto Rico has high asthma rates. This grant will be a great step toward improving public health and air quality in the areas surrounding the Port of San Juan.”
“We are delighted to be a grant recipient and continue our important work of reducing diesel emissions in Puerto Rico,” said Dr. Aluisio Pimenta, Professor at the Medical Sciences Campus of the University of Puerto Rico. “Our ultimate goal is to reduce asthma rates and improve overall health for Puerto Ricans.”
“Puerto Rico is one of the top U.S. jurisdictions with high prevalence of asthma. According to the Puerto Rico Department of Health, 15.5% of children suffer from this condition along with12.2% of adults on the Island. That is why we must continue to take every step and find new ways to protect the health and wellbeing of our people,” said Rep. Jenniffer Gonzalez Colon. “I thank Regional Administrator Pete Lopez and EPA for always being invaluable partners for Puerto Rico and granting the University of Puerto Rico Medical Campus this grant that will build on their work to reduce harmful diesel emissions and better the quality of life for all children and adults.”
The activities of this grant will take place in the metropolitan area of San Juan, Puerto Rico. Specifically, the grant will be targeted to areas that are particularly affected by the transportation of goods by drayage trucks going to and from the Port of San Juan. This project will replace trucks with engine model years from 1996-2006 with 2013 or newer trucks. The work for this grant will begin immediately and continue through the Spring of 2022.
It is estimated that this grant will reduce particulate matter emissions by 3.2 tons and nitrogen oxide emissions by 43.3 tons for the lifetime of the vehicles. This is the fourth DERA grant that EPA has awarded to the University of Puerto Rico – Medical Sciences Campus. In total, EPA has awarded close to $5 million for the replacement of 57 trucks and the retrofitting of 58 trucks, resulting in an estimated total particulate matter emissions reduction of 40.7 tons, and a total nitrogen oxide emissions reduction of 500.1 tons.
The Diesel Emissions Reduction Act (DERA) Program funds grants and rebates that protect human health and improve air quality by reducing harmful emissions from diesel engines. Since 2008, the DERA program has funded more than 1,000 clean diesel projects across the country, reducing emissions from more than 70,000 engines.
For more information about the Diesel Emissions Reduction Act is available at www.epa.gov/dera.
Follow EPA Region 2 on Twitter at http://twitter.com/eparegion2 and visit our Facebook page, http://facebook.com/eparegion2
20-036
# # #
What They Are Saying: EPA Proposes First Ever Rule to Improve Transparency of Guidance
WASHINGTON (May 19, 2020) — Today, as directed by President Trump’s Executive Order to promote transparency through improved agency guidance, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced its first-ever proposed rule to establish consistent requirements and procedures for the issuance of guidance documents. Here's what stakeholders and elected officials are saying:
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Regulatory Affairs and Federal Management Subcommittee Chairman Senator James Lankford (OK): “I am grateful for the EPA’s action today to increase transparency and clarity of its guidance and regulatory process. Complying with environmental regulations—or trying to make heads or tails of guidance that seems like a regulation—has been a consistent issue raised to me by Oklahoma small businesses throughout my time in Congress. I was glad to see the Trump Administration take decisive action late last year by issuing Executive Order 13891 to clarify what agency guidance is and what it isn’t. I recently introduced the Guidance Clarity Act, which would clarify in law that federal agency guidance documents are not legally binding. Today’s action by the EPA to implement the President’s Executive Order is a step in the right direction for small businesses, but my bill would set this appropriate action into law. Overall, this is a good-government win that will reduce regulatory compliance issues for Oklahomans.”
Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee Chairman Senator Roger Wicker (MS): “I appreciate President Trump’s and Administrator Wheeler’s commitment to regulatory reform and transparency. This proposed rule would ensure that the public is involved in every step of the decision making process for agency guidance.”
Senator Jim Inhofe (OK): “We all know previous administrations have abused the guidance process to initiate regulatory changes that they cannot achieve through the permissible regulatory process. Thankfully, the Trump administration continues to strive for transparency while cutting unnecessary red tape. This proposed rule by the EPA would establish clear requirements in issuing guidance documents. I have long fought for reform of our federal regulations and guidance transparency—I am glad to see Andrew Wheeler and President Trump taking action on this front.”
Senator Shelley Moore Capito (WV): “Improving the process for issuing regulatory guidance has been a widely discussed solution to cut bureaucratic red tape and boost our economy. I’m glad to see today’s decision by the EPA to allow more public input into the agency’s guidance documents. Doing so will give the public an even stronger voice in the regulatory process.”
Senator Thom Tillis (NC): “After successfully implementing regulatory reform efforts in North Carolina when I was Speaker of the House, I came to Congress to continue cutting red tape. Today’s announcement will do just that by bringing needed transparency and consistency to the federal regulatory process. I applaud President Trump and Administrator Wheeler for their leadership on this important issue. Together we can continue to improve and reform the regulatory process for our farmers, small businesses, and consumers.”
Senator Steve Daines (MT): “Increasing transparency and accountability within the EPA is critical for Montana businesses, environment and way of life. It is important federal agencies allow for robust public participation and involvement when considering new directives and this new rule will help do just that. I’m glad to see the administration keep their promises on increasing public transparency and accountability.”
Senator Kevin Cramer (ND): “Administrator Wheeler’s proposal would make the EPA's process more clear and transparent, empowering the people rather than the bureaucracy. It aligns with President Trump’s Executive Order to curtail an overreaching federal government by clamping down on burdensome guidance documents which were not publicly vetted, but they are treated as law. I applaud the Administrator for being proactive, and I encourage the rest of the federal government and all interested stakeholders to fully engage in this process.”
Energy and Commerce Committee Republican Leader Greg Walden (OR-02), Environment and Climate Change Subcommittee Republican Leader John Shimkus (IL-15): “This announcement is terrific news for the EPA, our federal government, and most importantly, American taxpayers. The Trump Administration has made great strides in righting the wrongs of the previous administration by making our federal government more efficient, transparent, and accessible. For far too long, EPA circumvented the rulemaking process through its use of guidance documents, which often led to significant burdens on American communities, businesses, and workers. Guidance documents typically have not been subject to a fair and transparent process for public review and comment, such as the last administration’s Waters of the U.S., or WOTUS, guidance. Today’s proposal creates more accountability and transparency in the guidance process, and we look forward to working with the Trump Administration to make sure the Executive Branch interprets and implements laws consistent with the intent of Congress and the will of the American people,” Walden and Shimkus said.
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Ranking Member Sam Graves (MO-06): “This is a big step toward major regulatory reform at EPA. Throughout the years, the EPA has been one of the most onerous regulatory agencies in the government, issuing more guidance documents than most other federal agencies. These guidance documents are often produced without adequate public notice or input from the regulated community, conflict with one another, and get enforced based on the whims of an individual regional office. Worst of all, guidance has too often served as a Trojan Horse for backdoor regulatory efforts that go beyond the scope of Congress’ intent and existing law. Americans deserve better than that, and this proposed rule will lead to a much more open and fair regulatory process. I commend Administrator Wheeler for working to reduce regulatory burdens that are unnecessary in the protection of our environment.”
Oversight and Government Reform Environment Subcommittee Ranking Member Congressman James Comer (KY-01): “Today, EPA announced a proposed rule that will promote transparency surrounding its guidance documents. This proposed rule benefits all Americans by clarifying how and why the Agency puts forth guidance documents. EPA has already published 9,000 guidance documents online making it substantially easier for the public to access. I want to applaud Administrator Wheeler for continuing to implement President Trump’s regulatory reform agenda with this proposed rule.”
Congressman Blaine Luetkemeyer (MO-03): “Past Administrations have side-stepped the rule-making process and Congressional oversight by enforcing guidance as if it was rule of law, which it most certainly is not. I applaud President Trump’s efforts to reign in this abuse and thank the EPA for providing a much-needed increase in transparency.”
Congressman Paul Gosar (AZ-04): “It is long overdue to bring transparency to the EPA which has traditionally engaged in abusive regulatory actions. The new guidance rule will give our communities, businesses, tribes, and individuals direct engagement and a public role in the process of EPA guidance for the first time, bringing EPA enforcement out of the bureaucratic black box that often clouds regulatory actions and nefarious political games. This rule will put a stop to political appointees at EPA abusing the guidance process to impose new regulatory and compliance burdens on American businesses. Everyone should celebrate when openness, transparency, and public engagement win the fight against the bureaucracy of Washington D.C.”
Congressman Mark Walker (NC-06): “In order to instill public trust and confidence in our institutions, federal agencies owe it to the American people to adopt parameters ensuring more transparency in the regulatory guidance process. I applaud the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for proactively taking a major step towards reforming their regulatory rules in accordance with President Trump’s Executive Order, and look forward to continuing our fight in Congress for permanent requirements.”
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Water Resources and Environment Subcommittee Ranking Member Bruce Westerman (AR-04): “If there’s anything that all government agencies could benefit from, it’s clearer guidelines and more transparency. These regulation reforms will make it easier for federal, state and local officials to carry out the EPA’s mission, and I applaud the administration for their proactive approach to these issues.”
Congressman Scott Tipton (CO-03): “The Federal rulemaking process is designed to allow for input by the members of the public who will be most impacted by the rules. Unfortunately, too many federal agencies use guidance documents to circumvent this process, creating de facto regulations with no transparency. The EPA is taking appropriate action that will improve its transparency in the rulemaking process by better addressing and incorporating public concerns, ensuring agency guidance does not circumvent Congressional intent, and setting a commonsense precedent that should be followed by all federal agencies.”
Congressman Jeff Duncan (SC-03): “I am pleased the EPA is taking this important step to advance President Trump’s Executive Order on regulatory guidance. This proposed rule aims to prevent bureaucrats in Washington from enacting burdensome, costly, and ineffective regulations without input from the public. This effort will provide transparency and allow for members of the public, stakeholders, and regulated parties to be engaged in the process.”
Congressman Dan Newhouse (WA-04): "Transparency is key to ensuring any guidance issued by EPA is done soundly to protect our most precious resources and to benefit the American people. I applaud Administrator Wheeler for not only modernizing and streamlining EPA's regulations but for making these changes available to the public."
Congressman Bill Posey (FL-08): “Once again, through transparency and accountability, the President continues to deliver on his promise to reform the regulatory process to protect American jobs and lower the cost of red tape.”
Congressman Andy Biggs (AZ-05): “Regulatory reform is a significant pillar of President Trump’s promise to make our federal government more transparent and efficient. With today’s announcement, Arizonans will now have an easier opportunity to participate in the EPA’s guidance process. I applaud Administrator Wheeler for implementing this worthy, pro-growth policy.”
North Carolina Lt. Governor Dan Forest: “This proposed rule by the EPA is another way that the Trump Administration is bringing more transparency to the regulatory process. This rule will help to shed more light on how regulations are applied to our farmers and our small and large businesses across the country, and hopefully lead to a fairer application of those regulations.”
Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge: “President Trump and his administration have prioritized transparency and consistency from the EPA for the benefit of all Americans. I applaud today’s announcement of the proposed rule to establish consistent requirements and procedures for the issuance of guidance documents.”
Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry: “Through consistency and transparency, the Trump EPA is allowing for more input from the public and more cooperation from the private sector. This wonderful move by the President and his administration will go a long way toward helping human health and the environment.”
Oklahoma Secretary of Energy and Environment Kenneth Wagner: “A formal process is so needed for dealing with EPA Guidance to allow public participation and ensure transparency. The process of determining what guidance applies, which is outdated, and if some exists at all is tedious and needlessly time consuming for regulators, industry and NGOs alike. Thanks to Administrator Wheeler for tackling this longstanding problem.”
Jefferson County (CO) Commissioner Libby Szabo, Jefferson County: “The American people deserve their government to be transparent and honest. This executive order will do just that. I want to applaud the President for taking this step in creating clear guidance the American people can count on.”
Lisa B. Nelson, CEO, American Legislative Exchange Council: “President Trump’s Executive Order to promote transparency at the Environmental Protect Agency creates a clear framework for when the agency should create a new regulation versus clarify an existing one. Too often, agencies use guidance documents to create new policy instead of simply providing more information on current regulations. This action by the Trump Administration promotes transparency and protects the public from potential overreach by the administrative state.”
Myron Ebell, Director, Center for Energy and Environment, Competitive Enterprise Institute: “EPA's proposed rule setting procedures and standards for developing guidance documents is another huge step toward getting the out-of-control administrative state under control. We hope officials at other federal agencies will follow Administrator Andrew Wheeler's leadership on this critical initiative.”
Chad Whiteman, Vice President Environment and Regulatory Affairs, U.S. Chamber Global Energy Institute: “The U.S. Chamber of Commerce supports EPA’s efforts to provide more transparency and fairness for all by formalizing a process in which the agency will develop and revise guidance documents. In recent years, the agency’s growing practice of regulating based on guidance documents that have not undergone formal notice and comment has created unnecessary confusion and uncertainty for stakeholders. This much needed reform will increase transparency by creating a systematic process for obtaining public input that will ensure a more level playing field for all interested parties, including businesses.”
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Regulatory Affairs and Federal Management Subcommittee Chairman Senator James Lankford (OK): “I am grateful for the EPA’s action today to increase transparency and clarity of its guidance and regulatory process. Complying with environmental regulations—or trying to make heads or tails of guidance that seems like a regulation—has been a consistent issue raised to me by Oklahoma small businesses throughout my time in Congress. I was glad to see the Trump Administration take decisive action late last year by issuing Executive Order 13891 to clarify what agency guidance is and what it isn’t. I recently introduced the Guidance Clarity Act, which would clarify in law that federal agency guidance documents are not legally binding. Today’s action by the EPA to implement the President’s Executive Order is a step in the right direction for small businesses, but my bill would set this appropriate action into law. Overall, this is a good-government win that will reduce regulatory compliance issues for Oklahomans.”
Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee Chairman Senator Roger Wicker (MS): “I appreciate President Trump’s and Administrator Wheeler’s commitment to regulatory reform and transparency. This proposed rule would ensure that the public is involved in every step of the decision making process for agency guidance.”
Senator Jim Inhofe (OK): “We all know previous administrations have abused the guidance process to initiate regulatory changes that they cannot achieve through the permissible regulatory process. Thankfully, the Trump administration continues to strive for transparency while cutting unnecessary red tape. This proposed rule by the EPA would establish clear requirements in issuing guidance documents. I have long fought for reform of our federal regulations and guidance transparency—I am glad to see Andrew Wheeler and President Trump taking action on this front.”
Senator Shelley Moore Capito (WV): “Improving the process for issuing regulatory guidance has been a widely discussed solution to cut bureaucratic red tape and boost our economy. I’m glad to see today’s decision by the EPA to allow more public input into the agency’s guidance documents. Doing so will give the public an even stronger voice in the regulatory process.”
Senator Thom Tillis (NC): “After successfully implementing regulatory reform efforts in North Carolina when I was Speaker of the House, I came to Congress to continue cutting red tape. Today’s announcement will do just that by bringing needed transparency and consistency to the federal regulatory process. I applaud President Trump and Administrator Wheeler for their leadership on this important issue. Together we can continue to improve and reform the regulatory process for our farmers, small businesses, and consumers.”
Senator Steve Daines (MT): “Increasing transparency and accountability within the EPA is critical for Montana businesses, environment and way of life. It is important federal agencies allow for robust public participation and involvement when considering new directives and this new rule will help do just that. I’m glad to see the administration keep their promises on increasing public transparency and accountability.”
Senator Kevin Cramer (ND): “Administrator Wheeler’s proposal would make the EPA's process more clear and transparent, empowering the people rather than the bureaucracy. It aligns with President Trump’s Executive Order to curtail an overreaching federal government by clamping down on burdensome guidance documents which were not publicly vetted, but they are treated as law. I applaud the Administrator for being proactive, and I encourage the rest of the federal government and all interested stakeholders to fully engage in this process.”
Energy and Commerce Committee Republican Leader Greg Walden (OR-02), Environment and Climate Change Subcommittee Republican Leader John Shimkus (IL-15): “This announcement is terrific news for the EPA, our federal government, and most importantly, American taxpayers. The Trump Administration has made great strides in righting the wrongs of the previous administration by making our federal government more efficient, transparent, and accessible. For far too long, EPA circumvented the rulemaking process through its use of guidance documents, which often led to significant burdens on American communities, businesses, and workers. Guidance documents typically have not been subject to a fair and transparent process for public review and comment, such as the last administration’s Waters of the U.S., or WOTUS, guidance. Today’s proposal creates more accountability and transparency in the guidance process, and we look forward to working with the Trump Administration to make sure the Executive Branch interprets and implements laws consistent with the intent of Congress and the will of the American people,” Walden and Shimkus said.
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Ranking Member Sam Graves (MO-06): “This is a big step toward major regulatory reform at EPA. Throughout the years, the EPA has been one of the most onerous regulatory agencies in the government, issuing more guidance documents than most other federal agencies. These guidance documents are often produced without adequate public notice or input from the regulated community, conflict with one another, and get enforced based on the whims of an individual regional office. Worst of all, guidance has too often served as a Trojan Horse for backdoor regulatory efforts that go beyond the scope of Congress’ intent and existing law. Americans deserve better than that, and this proposed rule will lead to a much more open and fair regulatory process. I commend Administrator Wheeler for working to reduce regulatory burdens that are unnecessary in the protection of our environment.”
Oversight and Government Reform Environment Subcommittee Ranking Member Congressman James Comer (KY-01): “Today, EPA announced a proposed rule that will promote transparency surrounding its guidance documents. This proposed rule benefits all Americans by clarifying how and why the Agency puts forth guidance documents. EPA has already published 9,000 guidance documents online making it substantially easier for the public to access. I want to applaud Administrator Wheeler for continuing to implement President Trump’s regulatory reform agenda with this proposed rule.”
Congressman Blaine Luetkemeyer (MO-03): “Past Administrations have side-stepped the rule-making process and Congressional oversight by enforcing guidance as if it was rule of law, which it most certainly is not. I applaud President Trump’s efforts to reign in this abuse and thank the EPA for providing a much-needed increase in transparency.”
Congressman Paul Gosar (AZ-04): “It is long overdue to bring transparency to the EPA which has traditionally engaged in abusive regulatory actions. The new guidance rule will give our communities, businesses, tribes, and individuals direct engagement and a public role in the process of EPA guidance for the first time, bringing EPA enforcement out of the bureaucratic black box that often clouds regulatory actions and nefarious political games. This rule will put a stop to political appointees at EPA abusing the guidance process to impose new regulatory and compliance burdens on American businesses. Everyone should celebrate when openness, transparency, and public engagement win the fight against the bureaucracy of Washington D.C.”
Congressman Mark Walker (NC-06): “In order to instill public trust and confidence in our institutions, federal agencies owe it to the American people to adopt parameters ensuring more transparency in the regulatory guidance process. I applaud the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for proactively taking a major step towards reforming their regulatory rules in accordance with President Trump’s Executive Order, and look forward to continuing our fight in Congress for permanent requirements.”
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Water Resources and Environment Subcommittee Ranking Member Bruce Westerman (AR-04): “If there’s anything that all government agencies could benefit from, it’s clearer guidelines and more transparency. These regulation reforms will make it easier for federal, state and local officials to carry out the EPA’s mission, and I applaud the administration for their proactive approach to these issues.”
Congressman Scott Tipton (CO-03): “The Federal rulemaking process is designed to allow for input by the members of the public who will be most impacted by the rules. Unfortunately, too many federal agencies use guidance documents to circumvent this process, creating de facto regulations with no transparency. The EPA is taking appropriate action that will improve its transparency in the rulemaking process by better addressing and incorporating public concerns, ensuring agency guidance does not circumvent Congressional intent, and setting a commonsense precedent that should be followed by all federal agencies.”
Congressman Jeff Duncan (SC-03): “I am pleased the EPA is taking this important step to advance President Trump’s Executive Order on regulatory guidance. This proposed rule aims to prevent bureaucrats in Washington from enacting burdensome, costly, and ineffective regulations without input from the public. This effort will provide transparency and allow for members of the public, stakeholders, and regulated parties to be engaged in the process.”
Congressman Dan Newhouse (WA-04): "Transparency is key to ensuring any guidance issued by EPA is done soundly to protect our most precious resources and to benefit the American people. I applaud Administrator Wheeler for not only modernizing and streamlining EPA's regulations but for making these changes available to the public."
Congressman Bill Posey (FL-08): “Once again, through transparency and accountability, the President continues to deliver on his promise to reform the regulatory process to protect American jobs and lower the cost of red tape.”
Congressman Andy Biggs (AZ-05): “Regulatory reform is a significant pillar of President Trump’s promise to make our federal government more transparent and efficient. With today’s announcement, Arizonans will now have an easier opportunity to participate in the EPA’s guidance process. I applaud Administrator Wheeler for implementing this worthy, pro-growth policy.”
North Carolina Lt. Governor Dan Forest: “This proposed rule by the EPA is another way that the Trump Administration is bringing more transparency to the regulatory process. This rule will help to shed more light on how regulations are applied to our farmers and our small and large businesses across the country, and hopefully lead to a fairer application of those regulations.”
Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge: “President Trump and his administration have prioritized transparency and consistency from the EPA for the benefit of all Americans. I applaud today’s announcement of the proposed rule to establish consistent requirements and procedures for the issuance of guidance documents.”
Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry: “Through consistency and transparency, the Trump EPA is allowing for more input from the public and more cooperation from the private sector. This wonderful move by the President and his administration will go a long way toward helping human health and the environment.”
Oklahoma Secretary of Energy and Environment Kenneth Wagner: “A formal process is so needed for dealing with EPA Guidance to allow public participation and ensure transparency. The process of determining what guidance applies, which is outdated, and if some exists at all is tedious and needlessly time consuming for regulators, industry and NGOs alike. Thanks to Administrator Wheeler for tackling this longstanding problem.”
Jefferson County (CO) Commissioner Libby Szabo, Jefferson County: “The American people deserve their government to be transparent and honest. This executive order will do just that. I want to applaud the President for taking this step in creating clear guidance the American people can count on.”
Lisa B. Nelson, CEO, American Legislative Exchange Council: “President Trump’s Executive Order to promote transparency at the Environmental Protect Agency creates a clear framework for when the agency should create a new regulation versus clarify an existing one. Too often, agencies use guidance documents to create new policy instead of simply providing more information on current regulations. This action by the Trump Administration promotes transparency and protects the public from potential overreach by the administrative state.”
Myron Ebell, Director, Center for Energy and Environment, Competitive Enterprise Institute: “EPA's proposed rule setting procedures and standards for developing guidance documents is another huge step toward getting the out-of-control administrative state under control. We hope officials at other federal agencies will follow Administrator Andrew Wheeler's leadership on this critical initiative.”
Chad Whiteman, Vice President Environment and Regulatory Affairs, U.S. Chamber Global Energy Institute: “The U.S. Chamber of Commerce supports EPA’s efforts to provide more transparency and fairness for all by formalizing a process in which the agency will develop and revise guidance documents. In recent years, the agency’s growing practice of regulating based on guidance documents that have not undergone formal notice and comment has created unnecessary confusion and uncertainty for stakeholders. This much needed reform will increase transparency by creating a systematic process for obtaining public input that will ensure a more level playing field for all interested parties, including businesses.”
EPA Reminds Rhode Islanders about Summer Safety Tips on Woonasquatucket River
PROVIDENCE, R.I. - Because summer weather will soon tempt local youth to find a place to swim, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is reminding the public how to safely enjoy the Woonasquatucket River.
Exposure to contamination in and along the river may pose a health risk to residents of Johnston, Providence, and North Providence. While progress has been made cleaning dioxin contaminated areas, EPA advises parents and other adults to make sure children remain protected from contaminants remaining in the water, sediment and soil.
In addition to following health-protective guidelines established by the Centers for Disease Control, as well as local, state and municipal directives during the pandemic, EPA's New England office advises area residents to follow these precautions when spending time at the Woonasquatucket River:
Do not come into contact with the Woonasquatucket River water; this includes wading in shallow water or swimming in the river.
Wash thoroughly after any contact with the river water, sediment or soil.
Do not eat fish, turtles, eels, other wildlife or plants from the river.
Do not dig into the river banks.
Obey the warning signs posted along the river.
While following any current federal, state and local health guidelines, the public can safely walk, run or bike along the river and paddle a canoe or kayak on the river.
EPA continues to make progress cleaning up the river. In July 2018, the United States and the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (RIDEM) entered into a settlement with two subsidiaries of Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. – Emhart Industries Inc. and Black & Decker, Inc. – who agreed to implement the September 2012 cleanup plan selected by EPA to clean up dioxin contaminated sediment and soil at the Centredale Manor Superfund Site.
The cleanup includes a cap over waste in the peninsula where the Centredale Manor and Brook Village apartment complexes are located and excavation of contaminated sediment and floodplain soil in the Allendale Pond, the large wetland below the Allendale Dam, and the Lyman Mill Pond.
The contractor under EPA and RIDEM oversight began field activities in 2019 and, in 2020, is continuing construction of a protective cap on the peninsula and conducting additional sampling in the ponds and wetlands further downstream. The cleanup is proceeding in phases along the Woonasquatucket River from Route 44 down to the Lyman Mill Dam and will take 5-6 years to complete. Residents along the river can expect to see field crews and equipment related to the cleanup actions.
EPA will update residents as the cleanup progresses. The cleanup plan is available at the North Providence and Johnston public libraries. EPA is working closely with the Woonasquatucket River Watershed Council to coordinate the cleanup with future restoration and public uses of the river.
More information:
EPA info on Woonasquatucket River and Centredale Manor cleanup: https://www.epa.gov/superfund/centredale
Woonasquatucket River Watershed Council's Downloadable "Do's and Don't" brochure (English) https://semspub.epa.gov/src/document/01/100011312
Woonasquatucket River Watershed Council's Downloadable "Do's and Don't" brochure (Espanol) https://semspub.epa.gov/src/document/01/627372
Exposure to contamination in and along the river may pose a health risk to residents of Johnston, Providence, and North Providence. While progress has been made cleaning dioxin contaminated areas, EPA advises parents and other adults to make sure children remain protected from contaminants remaining in the water, sediment and soil.
In addition to following health-protective guidelines established by the Centers for Disease Control, as well as local, state and municipal directives during the pandemic, EPA's New England office advises area residents to follow these precautions when spending time at the Woonasquatucket River:
Do not come into contact with the Woonasquatucket River water; this includes wading in shallow water or swimming in the river.
Wash thoroughly after any contact with the river water, sediment or soil.
Do not eat fish, turtles, eels, other wildlife or plants from the river.
Do not dig into the river banks.
Obey the warning signs posted along the river.
While following any current federal, state and local health guidelines, the public can safely walk, run or bike along the river and paddle a canoe or kayak on the river.
EPA continues to make progress cleaning up the river. In July 2018, the United States and the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (RIDEM) entered into a settlement with two subsidiaries of Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. – Emhart Industries Inc. and Black & Decker, Inc. – who agreed to implement the September 2012 cleanup plan selected by EPA to clean up dioxin contaminated sediment and soil at the Centredale Manor Superfund Site.
The cleanup includes a cap over waste in the peninsula where the Centredale Manor and Brook Village apartment complexes are located and excavation of contaminated sediment and floodplain soil in the Allendale Pond, the large wetland below the Allendale Dam, and the Lyman Mill Pond.
The contractor under EPA and RIDEM oversight began field activities in 2019 and, in 2020, is continuing construction of a protective cap on the peninsula and conducting additional sampling in the ponds and wetlands further downstream. The cleanup is proceeding in phases along the Woonasquatucket River from Route 44 down to the Lyman Mill Dam and will take 5-6 years to complete. Residents along the river can expect to see field crews and equipment related to the cleanup actions.
EPA will update residents as the cleanup progresses. The cleanup plan is available at the North Providence and Johnston public libraries. EPA is working closely with the Woonasquatucket River Watershed Council to coordinate the cleanup with future restoration and public uses of the river.
More information:
EPA info on Woonasquatucket River and Centredale Manor cleanup: https://www.epa.gov/superfund/centredale
Woonasquatucket River Watershed Council's Downloadable "Do's and Don't" brochure (English) https://semspub.epa.gov/src/document/01/100011312
Woonasquatucket River Watershed Council's Downloadable "Do's and Don't" brochure (Espanol) https://semspub.epa.gov/src/document/01/627372
EPA awards $854,977 to Michigan for study of Upper Peninsula’s Torch Lake
HOUGHTON, Mich. (May 18, 2020) — The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has awarded a Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) grant of $854,977 to the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) to test projects that could revitalize the population of benthic (bottom-dwelling) organisms in Torch Lake, located in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. The lake has been identified by the United States and Canada as one of 43 areas experiencing severe environmental degredation in the Great Lakes basin, known as Areas of Concern (AOCs).
“This GLRI funding will help identify ways to improve the health of Torch Lake’s ecosystem,” said Regional Administrator and Great Lakes National Program Manager Kurt Thiede. “We look forward to the results of Michigan’s pilot test and continued collaboration with our partners on restoration efforts at the AOC.”
“I’m grateful the EPA and the Trump Administration continue making investments in water quality across the First District,” said U.S. Rep. Jack Bergman (MI-01). “This grant for Torch Lake in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula is just another example of the importance of the GLRI program. I am hopeful this will bring us one step further in our efforts to ensure future generations have access to clean and safe water.”
Michigan EGLE will use GLRI funding to conduct a study that includes construction of pilot-scale test plots in shallow, nearshore areas of Torch Lake. The test plots, which will involve habitat restoration or the capping of contaminated sediments, will be evaluated as possible mechanisms for hastening the recovery of the plants and animals that live in the lakebed sediment.
Torch Lake has a diminished benthic community due to contamination from historical mining activities in the area. Results of the pilot study will be used to determine whether additional habitat restoration or capping projects could be used in the future to address environmental impairments within the Torch Lake AOC.
These projects are part of the larger effort to restore and protect the Great Lakes through the GLRI. In October 2019, EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler announced the GLRI Action Plan III, an aggressive plan that will guide Great Lakes restoration and protection activities by EPA and its many partners over the next 5 years.
For more information: https://www.epa.gov/great-lakes-aocs/torch-lake-aoc
###
“This GLRI funding will help identify ways to improve the health of Torch Lake’s ecosystem,” said Regional Administrator and Great Lakes National Program Manager Kurt Thiede. “We look forward to the results of Michigan’s pilot test and continued collaboration with our partners on restoration efforts at the AOC.”
“I’m grateful the EPA and the Trump Administration continue making investments in water quality across the First District,” said U.S. Rep. Jack Bergman (MI-01). “This grant for Torch Lake in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula is just another example of the importance of the GLRI program. I am hopeful this will bring us one step further in our efforts to ensure future generations have access to clean and safe water.”
Michigan EGLE will use GLRI funding to conduct a study that includes construction of pilot-scale test plots in shallow, nearshore areas of Torch Lake. The test plots, which will involve habitat restoration or the capping of contaminated sediments, will be evaluated as possible mechanisms for hastening the recovery of the plants and animals that live in the lakebed sediment.
Torch Lake has a diminished benthic community due to contamination from historical mining activities in the area. Results of the pilot study will be used to determine whether additional habitat restoration or capping projects could be used in the future to address environmental impairments within the Torch Lake AOC.
These projects are part of the larger effort to restore and protect the Great Lakes through the GLRI. In October 2019, EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler announced the GLRI Action Plan III, an aggressive plan that will guide Great Lakes restoration and protection activities by EPA and its many partners over the next 5 years.
For more information: https://www.epa.gov/great-lakes-aocs/torch-lake-aoc
###
EPA Takes Next Step to Implement PFAS Legislation
WASHINGTON (May 18, 2020) — Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) took the next step to implement an important per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) requirement of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The NDAA added 172 PFAS to the list of chemicals required to be reported to the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) and established a 100-pound reporting threshold for these substances. The agency is publishing a final rule that officially incorporates these requirements into the Code of Federal Regulations for TRI.
“EPA continues to prioritize and make progress to protect the health and well-being of communities across the country that are working to address PFAS,” said EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler. “The inclusion of these 172 PFAS on the TRI list will provide EPA and the public with important information on these emerging chemicals of concern.”
As this action is being taken to conform the regulations to a Congressional legislative mandate, this rule is effective immediately. Per the NDAA requirements, the PFAS additions became effective as of January 1, 2020. Reporting forms for these PFAS will be due to EPA by July 1, 2021, for calendar year 2020 data. EPA expects to release raw data from information collected by July 31, 2021.
To provide clear information on which chemicals fall under the NDAA requirement, in February 2020, EPA released a list of 172 PFAS chemicals that are subject to TRI reporting. Facilities in TRI-covered industry sectors should track and collect data on these PFAS during 2020. All TRI reporting requirements apply to these PFAS (e.g., supplier notification) and TRI reporting exemptions, if applicable, are available for these PFAS. Note that TRI reporting requirements state that a facility should use readily available data collected pursuant to other provisions of law or, where such data are not readily available, reasonable estimates of the amounts involved.
EPA’s TRI is an important tool that provides the public with information about the use of certain chemicals by tracking their management and associated activities. U.S. facilities in different industry sectors must report annually how much of each chemical is released to the environment and/or managed through recycling, energy recovery, and treatment. TRI helps support informed decision-making by companies, government agencies, non-governmental organizations and the public.
To view the final rule, visit https://www.epa.gov/toxics-release-inventory-tri-program/implementing-statutory-addition-certain-and-polyfluoroalkyl
Learn more about the addition of PFAS chemicals to TRI, including a list of the 172 PFAS subject to TRI reporting: https://www.epa.gov/toxics-release-inventory-tri-program/addition-certain-pfas-tri-national-defense-authorization-act
For more information EPA’s efforts under the PFAS Action Plan: https://www.epa.gov/pfas
“EPA continues to prioritize and make progress to protect the health and well-being of communities across the country that are working to address PFAS,” said EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler. “The inclusion of these 172 PFAS on the TRI list will provide EPA and the public with important information on these emerging chemicals of concern.”
As this action is being taken to conform the regulations to a Congressional legislative mandate, this rule is effective immediately. Per the NDAA requirements, the PFAS additions became effective as of January 1, 2020. Reporting forms for these PFAS will be due to EPA by July 1, 2021, for calendar year 2020 data. EPA expects to release raw data from information collected by July 31, 2021.
To provide clear information on which chemicals fall under the NDAA requirement, in February 2020, EPA released a list of 172 PFAS chemicals that are subject to TRI reporting. Facilities in TRI-covered industry sectors should track and collect data on these PFAS during 2020. All TRI reporting requirements apply to these PFAS (e.g., supplier notification) and TRI reporting exemptions, if applicable, are available for these PFAS. Note that TRI reporting requirements state that a facility should use readily available data collected pursuant to other provisions of law or, where such data are not readily available, reasonable estimates of the amounts involved.
EPA’s TRI is an important tool that provides the public with information about the use of certain chemicals by tracking their management and associated activities. U.S. facilities in different industry sectors must report annually how much of each chemical is released to the environment and/or managed through recycling, energy recovery, and treatment. TRI helps support informed decision-making by companies, government agencies, non-governmental organizations and the public.
To view the final rule, visit https://www.epa.gov/toxics-release-inventory-tri-program/implementing-statutory-addition-certain-and-polyfluoroalkyl
Learn more about the addition of PFAS chemicals to TRI, including a list of the 172 PFAS subject to TRI reporting: https://www.epa.gov/toxics-release-inventory-tri-program/addition-certain-pfas-tri-national-defense-authorization-act
For more information EPA’s efforts under the PFAS Action Plan: https://www.epa.gov/pfas
EPA Provides $6 Million to Reduce Excess Ag Runoff to the Chesapeake Bay
WASHINGTON (May 18, 2020) — Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced the allocation of $6 million to Chesapeake Bay states to improve water quality by reducing excess nitrogen from agricultural operations.
“The water quality in the Chesapeake Bay watershed has recently reached the highest standards in more than 30 years,” said EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler. “The primary focus of this funding is the continued reduction of nitrogen from agricultural sources, which has been one of the most difficult hurdles to overcome as we strive to make the Bay ever cleaner.”
“We have determined where these additional funds can best be put to use to most effectively result in the greatest water quality benefits in the bay,” said EPA Regional Administrator Cosmo Servidio. “The efforts will also help to improve local streams and rivers across the watershed.”
The $6 million is part of an increase in the FY 2020 EPA Chesapeake Bay Program budget approved by Congress and signed by President Trump. The funds were designated for “state-based implementation in the most effective basins.”
EPA analyses have shown that reducing nitrogen through improved agricultural practices in the bay watershed is far less costly – and more effective – than reducing phosphorus to improve water quality.
Each state in the Chesapeake Bay watershed recently submitted Phase III Watershed Implementation Plans (WIP), in which they committed to reduce nitrogen loads from the agriculture sector from 2019 to 2025. The following funding allocations were calculated as a percentage of the total of each bay jurisdictions’ WIP commitments:
Pennsylvania: $3,695,112
Virginia: $1,110,191
Maryland: $695,940
Delaware: $364,540
New York: $79,536
West Virginia: $54,681
The District of Columbia, the remaining jurisdictional partner, does not have an agricultural commitment in its Phase III WIP.
The funding must be prioritized in each state to their most effective basins (allowing for the greatest impact from the reduction in nitrogen), and to those projects that implement “Best Management Practices” with the highest effectiveness.
Each of the 383 basins in the Chesapeake Bay watershed was evaluated as part of the relative effectiveness determination. A total of 26 of the top 30 most effective basins are located in Pennsylvania, including all of the top 15.
Pennsylvania had 61.6% of the commitments to reduce nitrogen from agricultural sources in the jurisdictions’ Phase III WIPs. West Virginia, by contrast, accounted for only 0.91% of those commitments. As a result, the nearly $3.7 million in “most effective” funding is the latest EPA financial support to help Pennsylvania achieve its 2025 Bay Total Maximum Daily Load goals. EPA is increasing its Chesapeake Bay Program funding for Pennsylvania because it has the largest commitment to reduce nitrogen.
EPA plans to add the funding to the bay states’ Chesapeake Bay grants, or, in some cases, provide it to third parties through a Request for Applications. The states will be expected to track implementation activities they fund with this money.
For more information about EPA’s role in the Chesapeake Bay program, visit https://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/about-chesapeake-bay-program-office.
“The water quality in the Chesapeake Bay watershed has recently reached the highest standards in more than 30 years,” said EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler. “The primary focus of this funding is the continued reduction of nitrogen from agricultural sources, which has been one of the most difficult hurdles to overcome as we strive to make the Bay ever cleaner.”
“We have determined where these additional funds can best be put to use to most effectively result in the greatest water quality benefits in the bay,” said EPA Regional Administrator Cosmo Servidio. “The efforts will also help to improve local streams and rivers across the watershed.”
The $6 million is part of an increase in the FY 2020 EPA Chesapeake Bay Program budget approved by Congress and signed by President Trump. The funds were designated for “state-based implementation in the most effective basins.”
EPA analyses have shown that reducing nitrogen through improved agricultural practices in the bay watershed is far less costly – and more effective – than reducing phosphorus to improve water quality.
Each state in the Chesapeake Bay watershed recently submitted Phase III Watershed Implementation Plans (WIP), in which they committed to reduce nitrogen loads from the agriculture sector from 2019 to 2025. The following funding allocations were calculated as a percentage of the total of each bay jurisdictions’ WIP commitments:
Pennsylvania: $3,695,112
Virginia: $1,110,191
Maryland: $695,940
Delaware: $364,540
New York: $79,536
West Virginia: $54,681
The District of Columbia, the remaining jurisdictional partner, does not have an agricultural commitment in its Phase III WIP.
The funding must be prioritized in each state to their most effective basins (allowing for the greatest impact from the reduction in nitrogen), and to those projects that implement “Best Management Practices” with the highest effectiveness.
Each of the 383 basins in the Chesapeake Bay watershed was evaluated as part of the relative effectiveness determination. A total of 26 of the top 30 most effective basins are located in Pennsylvania, including all of the top 15.
Pennsylvania had 61.6% of the commitments to reduce nitrogen from agricultural sources in the jurisdictions’ Phase III WIPs. West Virginia, by contrast, accounted for only 0.91% of those commitments. As a result, the nearly $3.7 million in “most effective” funding is the latest EPA financial support to help Pennsylvania achieve its 2025 Bay Total Maximum Daily Load goals. EPA is increasing its Chesapeake Bay Program funding for Pennsylvania because it has the largest commitment to reduce nitrogen.
EPA plans to add the funding to the bay states’ Chesapeake Bay grants, or, in some cases, provide it to third parties through a Request for Applications. The states will be expected to track implementation activities they fund with this money.
For more information about EPA’s role in the Chesapeake Bay program, visit https://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/about-chesapeake-bay-program-office.
EPA Provides $6 Million to Reduce Excess Ag Runoff to the Chesapeake Bay
WASHINGTON (May 18, 2020) - Today the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced the allocation of $6 million to Chesapeake Bay states to improve water quality by reducing excess nitrogen from agricultural operations."The water quality in the Chesapeake Bay watershed has recently reached the highest standards in more than 30 years," said EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler. "The primary focus of this funding is the continued reduction of nitrogen from agricultural sources, which has been one of the most difficult hurdles to overcome as we strive to make the Bay ever cleaner.""We have determined where these additional funds can best be put to use to most effectively result in the greatest water quality benefits in the bay," said EPA Regional Administrator Cosmo Servidio. "The efforts will also help to improve local streams and rivers across the watershed."The $6 million is part of an increase in the FY 2020 EPA Chesapeake Bay Program budget approved by Congress and signed by President Trump. The funds were designated for "state-based implementation in the most effective basins."EPA analyses have shown that reducing nitrogen through improved agricultural practices in the bay watershed is far less costly - and more effective - than reducing phosphorus to improve water quality.Each state in the Chesapeake Bay watershed recently submitted Phase III Watershed Implementation Plans (WIP), in which they committed to reduce nitrogen loads from the agriculture sector from 2019 to 2025. The following funding allocations were calculated as a percentage of the total of each bay jurisdictions' WIP commitments:Pennsylvania: $3,695,112
Virginia: $1,110,191
Maryland: $695,940
Delaware: $364,540
New York: $79,536
West Virginia: $54,681
The District of Columbia, the remaining jurisdictional partner, does not have an agricultural commitment in its Phase III WIP.The funding must be prioritized in each state to their most effective basins (allowing for the greatest impact from the reduction in nitrogen), and to those projects that implement "Best Management Practices" with the highest effectiveness.Each of the 383 basins in the Chesapeake Bay watershed was evaluated as part of the relative effectiveness determination. A total of 26 of the top 30 most effective basins are located in Pennsylvania, including all of the top 15.Pennsylvania had 61.6% of the commitments to reduce nitrogen from agricultural sources in the jurisdictions' Phase III WIPs. West Virginia, by contrast, accounted for only 0.91% of those commitments. As a result, the nearly $3.7 million in "most effective" funding is the latest EPA financial support to help Pennsylvania achieve its 2025 Bay Total Maximum Daily Load goals. EPA is increasing its Chesapeake Bay Program funding for Pennsylvania because it has the largest commitment to reduce nitrogen.EPA plans to add the funding to the bay states' Chesapeake Bay grants, or, in some cases, provide it to third parties through a Request for Applications. The states will be expected to track implementation activities they fund with this money.For more information about EPA's role in the Chesapeake Bay program, visit https://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/about-chesapeake-bay-program-office.
Virginia: $1,110,191
Maryland: $695,940
Delaware: $364,540
New York: $79,536
West Virginia: $54,681
The District of Columbia, the remaining jurisdictional partner, does not have an agricultural commitment in its Phase III WIP.The funding must be prioritized in each state to their most effective basins (allowing for the greatest impact from the reduction in nitrogen), and to those projects that implement "Best Management Practices" with the highest effectiveness.Each of the 383 basins in the Chesapeake Bay watershed was evaluated as part of the relative effectiveness determination. A total of 26 of the top 30 most effective basins are located in Pennsylvania, including all of the top 15.Pennsylvania had 61.6% of the commitments to reduce nitrogen from agricultural sources in the jurisdictions' Phase III WIPs. West Virginia, by contrast, accounted for only 0.91% of those commitments. As a result, the nearly $3.7 million in "most effective" funding is the latest EPA financial support to help Pennsylvania achieve its 2025 Bay Total Maximum Daily Load goals. EPA is increasing its Chesapeake Bay Program funding for Pennsylvania because it has the largest commitment to reduce nitrogen.EPA plans to add the funding to the bay states' Chesapeake Bay grants, or, in some cases, provide it to third parties through a Request for Applications. The states will be expected to track implementation activities they fund with this money.For more information about EPA's role in the Chesapeake Bay program, visit https://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/about-chesapeake-bay-program-office.
Evansville to Receive EPA Technical Assistance to Spur Economy with Locally-Produced Foods
For Immediate Release No. 20-OPA-049
EVANSVILLE, Ind. (May 15,2020) –Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), along with the U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Marketing Service, announced technical assistance for Evansville, Ind., to help develop a multi-use food center at the site of the Tri-State Food Bank, 801 Michigan Avenue. This would boost economic opportunities for local entrepreneurs while promoting clean air, safe water, open space and healthy food choices.“The Trump Administration is committed to helping communities develop and strengthen their local food economy by investing in opportunity zones in often under privileged communities, some of which have been hard hit by the coronavirus outbreak,” said EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler. “Support for local food initiatives can improve access to fresh foods, support farmers, grow new businesses, keep Americans healthy and improve the environment.”
“EPA is eager to help Evansville in its plans to develop a local multi-use food center,” said EPA Regional Administrator Kurt Thiede. “The new food center would potentially help revitalize the neighborhood and provide a space for food growing and preparation, and a commercial kitchen to incubate new local food businesses.”
“The technical assistance offered by Local Foods, Local Places is great opportunity for the City to more closely examine the challenges around food insecurity that we have within our urban core and Promise Zone,” said Kelley Coures, Executive Director, City of Evansville Department of Metropolitan Development. “The assistance can also provide resources to local food entrepreneurs who we want to establish businesses here in the City especially in our Downtown, Haynie's Corner, Franklin Street and North Main areas. These types of businesses serve as economic and social hubs within our neighborhoods that bring the entire community together.”
The Tri-State Food Bank distributes foods to food pantries in Indiana, Illinois and Kentucky. To better serve the growing demand, the food bank has chosen to relocate. Evansville is requesting technical assistance to determine if the current Food Bank site is a viable option for creating a multi-use food center with indoor urban garden, raised food beds, food hub, produce gleaning center and commercial kitchen with cold storage rental space.
Evansville will get access to a team of federal, state and regional agricultural, environmental, public health, architectural and economic development experts to help devise an action plan, set goals and identify local assets that can support the local food economy and contribute revitalization downtown and in neighborhoods.
The assistance is provided through the Local Foods, Local Places program, a federal initiative that helps communities reinvest in existing neighborhoods and improve quality of life through the sustainable development of the local food economy. The effort will build upon the work of local leadership in coordinating local food production, commercial kitchen availability, farmers markets, nutrition, food entrepreneurship and downtown redevelopment.
Evansville has an Opportunity Zone like most of the 16 communities nationwide selected for this program in support of the President Trump’s Executive Order 13853.
Nearly all communities selected include Opportunity Zones, in support of President Trump’s Executive Order 13853. The assistance is provided through the Local Foods, Local Places (LFLP) program, a federal initiative that helps communities reinvest in existing neighborhoods and improve quality of life through the sustainable development of their local food economy.
EPA will be flexible on the timing of next steps for the project, as necessary, considering that many communities are still dealing with issues related to COVID-19.
For more information on Local Food, Local Places: http://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/local-foods-local-places
###
EVANSVILLE, Ind. (May 15,2020) –Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), along with the U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Marketing Service, announced technical assistance for Evansville, Ind., to help develop a multi-use food center at the site of the Tri-State Food Bank, 801 Michigan Avenue. This would boost economic opportunities for local entrepreneurs while promoting clean air, safe water, open space and healthy food choices.“The Trump Administration is committed to helping communities develop and strengthen their local food economy by investing in opportunity zones in often under privileged communities, some of which have been hard hit by the coronavirus outbreak,” said EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler. “Support for local food initiatives can improve access to fresh foods, support farmers, grow new businesses, keep Americans healthy and improve the environment.”
“EPA is eager to help Evansville in its plans to develop a local multi-use food center,” said EPA Regional Administrator Kurt Thiede. “The new food center would potentially help revitalize the neighborhood and provide a space for food growing and preparation, and a commercial kitchen to incubate new local food businesses.”
“The technical assistance offered by Local Foods, Local Places is great opportunity for the City to more closely examine the challenges around food insecurity that we have within our urban core and Promise Zone,” said Kelley Coures, Executive Director, City of Evansville Department of Metropolitan Development. “The assistance can also provide resources to local food entrepreneurs who we want to establish businesses here in the City especially in our Downtown, Haynie's Corner, Franklin Street and North Main areas. These types of businesses serve as economic and social hubs within our neighborhoods that bring the entire community together.”
The Tri-State Food Bank distributes foods to food pantries in Indiana, Illinois and Kentucky. To better serve the growing demand, the food bank has chosen to relocate. Evansville is requesting technical assistance to determine if the current Food Bank site is a viable option for creating a multi-use food center with indoor urban garden, raised food beds, food hub, produce gleaning center and commercial kitchen with cold storage rental space.
Evansville will get access to a team of federal, state and regional agricultural, environmental, public health, architectural and economic development experts to help devise an action plan, set goals and identify local assets that can support the local food economy and contribute revitalization downtown and in neighborhoods.
The assistance is provided through the Local Foods, Local Places program, a federal initiative that helps communities reinvest in existing neighborhoods and improve quality of life through the sustainable development of the local food economy. The effort will build upon the work of local leadership in coordinating local food production, commercial kitchen availability, farmers markets, nutrition, food entrepreneurship and downtown redevelopment.
Evansville has an Opportunity Zone like most of the 16 communities nationwide selected for this program in support of the President Trump’s Executive Order 13853.
Nearly all communities selected include Opportunity Zones, in support of President Trump’s Executive Order 13853. The assistance is provided through the Local Foods, Local Places (LFLP) program, a federal initiative that helps communities reinvest in existing neighborhoods and improve quality of life through the sustainable development of their local food economy.
EPA will be flexible on the timing of next steps for the project, as necessary, considering that many communities are still dealing with issues related to COVID-19.
For more information on Local Food, Local Places: http://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/local-foods-local-places
###